Our second-most important suggestion had to do with how and when construction materials were to be brought into the buildings. The width of the building’s windows was to be unusually small, just eighteen inches wide; the reason for such a small width was to ensure that a person looking through a window from an upper floor would not feel that he or she was in danger of falling out. This design feature controlled the over-all structural pattern: a steel cage in which the open spaces would be the windows. What the architects had not figured into the design was that the small window size would prevent materials such as plasterboard and ductwork, being brought into the building by cranes. In other words, the design would seriously hamper construction. We suggested that a minor change could make construction easier: the corners of the towers could be “splayed,” instead of at 90-degree angles, as the architect’s plan called for. This splaying would open a wider area into which materials could be inserted.
10 Mobile Home Decorating Ideas Single Wide Photo Gallery
Austin Tobin was known as an autocrat, polished and sophisticated but also very rough on his subordinates and on those wanting anything from the PA. However, with me he was always very considerate and respectful, and treated me very well, perhaps because he appreciated that we were trying our best to apply our owner/builder experience to his project and to help him save time and money. Our Construction Management approach constituted a new method for the PA, one contrary to Tobin’s experience of hiring “lowest bidder” general contractors. With GC’s, the Port Authority had always had to argue over claims for extras and for cost overruns caused by timing delays. Our CM approach would eliminate those headaches for him. He also sensed that I shared his excitement at being involved in his decade-long dream of erecting a World Trade Center. Tobin and the PA commissioners recognized the worth of the design changes that we proposed, and chose us to handle the pre-construction phase of the entire project. But there was a catch.
Because of all the pressure that Fuller and Turner were able to apply to the board of commissioners, the PA contract specifically stated that the firm selected for pre-construction must “terminate” its services after the pre-construction phase.
To bring down the cost of the steel in the Towers, we divided up the work among eleven different firms.
I was not willing to sign a contract with such a clause in it, but I wanted the job, so I sought some expert help in getting past this potential contract-killing clause.
Samuel I. Rosenman, a lawyer who had been a speechwriter for Presidents Roosevelt and Truman, was my neighbor and friend, and I asked him to assist me in having this contractual clause eliminated and a substitute written in that would allow us to be considered for the construction phase but that would meet the PA’s requirements by not assuring us of being selected. The PA’s original concept had been that at the end of the pre-construction phase, they would ask for bids on the second phase, the construction phase. To Tobin and the PA’s chief of construction, Sam Rosenman and I argued that our taking the contract for the pre-construction advisory phase should not automatically preclude us from being considered to handle the construction phase and that our substitute clause would protect them and protect us. Eventually, they agreed.